Intel Analysis: Executive Risk Fusion Center...

How often do you try and prove that a risk hypothesis is true? Is it possible that each piece of evidence that you collect or information you process is utilized to try and prove that your hypothesis is correct.

Analysis of executive Operational Risk Intelligence in your corporation is typically being processed within the organizational silos of your enterprise business units. How it is being shared, how often and then how it is being analyzed, compared and used to confirm or refute multiple hypotheses, can make the difference in your corporate business survival.

The ACH methodology developed by Richards J. Heuer, Jr., is a vital component of Operational Risk Management (ORM).  It can be utilized with your internal Executive "Risk Fusion" Center where the Board of Directors, Senior Management and corporate risk directors determine the correct strategic course for the future:

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) is a simple model for how to think about a complex problem. It is an analytic process that identifies a complete set of alternative hypotheses, systematically evaluates data that is consistent and inconsistent with each hypothesis, and rejects hypotheses that contain too much inconsistent data. ACH takes you through a process for making well-reasoned, analytical judgments. It is particularly useful for issues that require a careful weighing of alternative explanations of what has happened or is happening. ACH can also be used to provide early warning or help you evaluate alternative scenarios of what might happen in the future. ACH helps you overcome, or at least minimize, some of the cognitive limitations that make prescient intelligence analysis so difficult; it helps clarify why analysts are talking past one another and do not understand each other’s interpretation of the data. ACH is grounded in basic insights from cognitive psychology, decision analysis, and the scientific method.

What is the likelihood that the General Manager, Global Security of your enterprise is looking at surveillance information on a rogue employee today to assess workplace threat and to help keep the company safe? Simultaneously, the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is analyzing the latest log data from various intrusion systems to determine if the "Advanced Persistent Threat" (APT) has changed it's cyber tactics to steal the latest software R&D architecture from the office suite business unit. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Head of Internal Audit are analyzing the latest revenue reports with the Vice-President of Sales & Marketing to determine why the Asia Pacific team have been losing 8 out of 10 business deals in the forecast pipeline.

The likelihood is high. Each is formulating a hypothesis independently of each other and in most cases they will never know that there is a risk related nexus to the entire enterprise. The reason is that your Executive "Risk Fusion" Center does not exist or is unable to analyze competing questions that are being asked about potential areas of concern. So when do you use this approach and the ACH methodology?

Use ACH when the judgment or decision is so important that you can't afford to be wrong. Use it to record and organize relevant evidence prior to making an analytical judgment or decision. Use it to identify and then question assumptions that may be driving your thinking, perhaps without realizing it. Use it when the evidence you are working with may be influenced by denial and deception. Use it when gut feelings are not good enough, and you need a more systematic approach that raises questions you had not thought of. Use it to prevent being surprised by an unforeseen outcome. Use it when an issue is particularly controversial and you want to highlight the precise sources of disagreement. Use it to maintain a record of how and why you reached your conclusion.

The human mind needs modern software analytics, proven cognitive tools and vetted processes of thinking to arrive at the answer. While the answer may not be what you seek, it is the answer to the question, without a doubt. Live with it or discard it. This does not matter.

What does matter is that the Executive "Risk Fusion" Center brought together the best of all these operational risk components and whether the human chooses to accept it or ignore it could be our corporate prosperity or peril. What do you think AI?

Asymmetric Warfare: Board Room to Battlefield...

The planet Earth is experiencing a multitude of historical and 21st century "Asymmetric Wars" from the Board Rooms of the Global 500, Internet Cafes of Third World countries and the Miranshah.

Operational Risk Management (ORM) doctrine will continue to be a factor:

a·sym·met·ric

   [ey-suh-me-trik, as-uh-]  Show IPA

adjective

1.

not identical on both sides of a central line;

"Asymmetric warfare" can describe a conflict in which the resources of two belligerents differ in essence and in the struggle, interact and attempt to exploit each other's characteristic weaknesses. Such struggles often involve strategies and tactics of unconventional warfare, the "weaker" combatants attempting to use strategy to offset deficiencies in quantity or quality.^[1] Such strategies may not necessarily be militarized.^[2] This is in contrast to symmetric warfare, where two powers have similar military power and resources and rely on tactics that are similar overall, differing only in details and execution.

The Irish Republican Army (IRA) perfected the car bomb against the British.  Now "Improvised Explosive Devices" (IED) and suicide bombers continue to be the single greatest threat to U.S. troops in Afghanistan as we withdrew and in Iraq as we engage once again. The Middle East has been embroiled in conflicts with the modern use of "Social Media" and an asymmetric rebel element to initiate change in labor laws or to overthrow a nation states leadership.

A laymen may not understand the relevance of "Asymmetric Warfare" on the corporate battlefield. Some would describe the age old tactic of industrial espionage, competitive intelligence or even patent litigation as a method for a small unknown company to gain an advantage over a much larger and established institution. This is a strategy of Asymmetric Warfare, nothing new.

In any case, the perception is that the small and agile still have the means, tools and tactics to defeat the large and overbearing with the benefit of time, resources and the will of the people.

So what are some good examples of modern day asymmetric conflicts:

• Apple vs. Google
• NATO vs. Putin
• Sunni vs. Shiite
• BMW vs. Jaguar
• Earth vs. Anonymous
• Taliban vs. Afghans
• United States vs. Jones

Each of these represent a conflict between two able parties, regardless of the perception of who is the "David" and who is the "Goliath". So what can your organization or nations state do to prepare yourself for the inevitable risks that will be associated with doing business or operating your enterprise across countries and in hostile environments?

By providing your employees and stakeholders the best education, research, training and exercise programs; technology test and evaluation and capability improvement programs that your resources can offer.  Why?  In a few words, to make faster and more informed "Trust Decisions".

The desire to Deter, Detect, Defend and Document is prudent doctrine in Operational Risk Management (ORM). You may call these steps or tactics by other names in your particular process; such as Observe, Orient, Decide Act (OODA). What matters most is that the environment and landscape for the "Asymmetric Threats" and "Asymmetric Warfare" will continue to be challenging and dynamic.

BY ASSOCIATED PRESS June 16 2014

WASHINGTON — Judges around the country are grappling with the ripple effects of a 2-year-old Supreme Court ruling on GPS tracking, reaching conflicting conclusions on the case’s broader meaning and tackling unresolved questions that flare in a world where privacy and technology increasingly collide. 

The January 2012 opinion in United States v. Jones set constitutional boundaries for law enforcement’s use of GPS devices to track the whereabouts of criminal suspects. But the different legal rationales offered by the justices have left a muddled legal landscape for police and lower-court judges, who have struggled in the last two years with how and when to apply the decision — especially at a time when new technologies are developed at a faster rate than judicial opinions are issued. 

The result is that courts in different jurisdictions have reached different conclusions on similar issues, providing little uniformity for law enforcement and judges on core constitutional questions. Technological advancements are forcing the issue more and more, a development magnified by a heightened national debate over privacy versus surveillance and the disclosure of the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of Americans’ telephone records.

Competition: Life Long Learning Experience…

When you were growing up in your town across the USA, they probably had all kinds of ways for you as a kid to learn about competition.

Was it the Spelling Bee?  The Debate team. The High School ball sports games, running track or swimming meets. Cheer competitions. Car racing. The neighborhood park “Art” & “Pottery” contest. The city Golf championship.

Before you headed out of your own household to universities or colleges in other states or joined up with our Armed Forces and were stationed overseas, you really thought you understood what competition was all about didn't you.

Or did you?

competition

com· pe· ti· tion ˌkäm-pə-ˈti-shən

Synonyms of competition

1: the act or process of competing

compete

com· pete kəm-ˈpēt

1: to strive consciously or unconsciously for an objective (such as position, profit, or a prize) : be in a state of rivalry

The fact that you were in competition with others for the best example of your intellect, or your strength or your speed or your accuracy or creativity would soon become more of a life question.

"Who shall I serve in my years ahead and trust to help me navigate the joys and sorrows of my life long journey?"

How will they provide me with the wisdom and the guidance to know what is the right decision to make at the right time?

Competition in life is unavoidable and you might wonder why some people “Win” on one day and not on another.  Was it luck?

Just ask anyone who has made it to a C-Suite at Headquarters, or “Hall of Fame” or other Museum of History and the people who excelled at their particular Profession, Sport or Craft or Exploration milestone.

Have you ever heard someone say in your long competitive life:  “It’s not about Winning and Losing it is about how you play the game”.

What does that really mean?  Is it about following the rules and playing with good manners or sportsmanship?

Competition is truly a life learning experience whether it played on the field, in the pool, on the mountain, on the ice rink, on the track, in the auditorium, on the stage, in the conference room or the ready room, face-to face or online, it does not really matter.

Some may say it was lots of Time and Practice.  Some may say it was a Miracle.

What shall you learn about Competition in your own life?

Some may say it was "My Destiny"...

Godspeed!

Intelligence Sharing: Responsibility to Provide...

Back in the summer of 2008, the "Need to Know" was now finally becoming extinct. Intelligence Communities around the globe began ever so slightly changing their behavior.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) had released it's Information Sharing Strategy:

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence was announcing the first-ever strategy to improve the ability of intelligence professionals to share information, ultimately strengthening national security.

The "Responsibility to Provide" attitude combined with a "Rule-set" reset could get the entities moving the right direction. Risk Managers in institutions in the private sector have been grappling with this business issue for multiple decades.

The reality that the FBI, NSA, CIA and DHS are sharing more effectively will only be evident in actual behaviors, not technology.

The new mantra "Responsibility to Provide" would be repeated over and over but where is the evidence?  

The culture shift was predicated on the ability to manage risks associated with mission effectiveness and disclosure of sensitive information. A Trusted Environment.

This new information sharing model is not revolutionary and requires the same care with privacy, information security and civil liberties that we all expect when it comes to personal identifiable information.

Adding new incentives to share information or rewards for doing so will soon be the norm and the behavior changes will be evident. Great care will be given to the ability to protect sources and methods of collection.

Creating a "Single Information Environment" (SIE) will improve the ability for analysts and investigators to get access earlier and to discover what exists. Enhancing collaboration across the IC community would be a strategic goal and has been a dream for over twenty years.

So let's go back to the "Trust Model" for a minute:

• Governance: The environment influencing sharing.
• Policy: The "rules" for sharing.
• Technology: The "capability" to enable sharing.
• Culture: The "will" to share.
• Economics: The "value" of sharing.

A 500 day plan was then in place. The integration has now been reemphasized even today. Let's make sure that our vigilance continues and on this Martin Luther King Jr. weekend, our spirits are reenergized...

Proactive Measures: Beyond the Perimeter...

Operational Risk Management requires both proactive and passive measures that encompass a comprehensive organizational strategy. Odds are that you have devoted a majority of your time and resources to this point on the passive mode of preparedness and defense. A reactive and alert oriented focus. The time has come to change the priorities and to increase the allocation of strategy on the "Active Measures." Why?

Stuxnet is and was ground zero for a new generation of digital infrastructure cyber weapons.

The attribution game is still going on with several suspects on who actually developed, tested and deployed "Stuxnet." This is not as important as the realization that sitting back and waiting for the next variant or hybrid cyber weapon to attack your critical infrastructure assets in passive mode.

"The most advanced organizations are now taking the "Proactive" stance to not only detect changes in their environment in a more real-time mode, but they are starting to hunt down the attackers."

There is a decision point where you realize that the passive mode will not buy you time nor will it redirect your attackers to other more vulnerable assets. Your organization will continue to operate with the goal of serving your clients, members or customers yet simultaneously a "SpecOPS" team of internal experts will be monitoring, measuring and exercising tactics to legally neutralize the threat before them.

Commercial and non-governmental entities are creating the means and the capabilities to deter, detect and document who is attacking their digital systems and where they can be found. This intelligence is being shared within the private sector organizations to determine fingerprints, modus operandi and other evidence that is required to effectively hunt down the attackers. The next challenge will be how to package this and make sure that the proper authorities are notified in a timely manner.

There is no longer a solution that is wide enough or in depth enough to be distributed across a whole spectrum of companies or organizations. The answers will be specific, customized to the unique environment and infrastructure that comprises a particular enterprise.

In order for that specification to be developed internally and provided to the correct people, you have to have the internal mechanisms in place to know in real-time what is changing and how fast it is changing from the normal state.

Is your view beyond your own perimeter? Are you looking for the anomalies that are over the horizon and could impact your network soon? It's one thing to look at the changes to your own perimeter but what about the intelligence on providers and ISP's somewhere on the other side of the planet? Do you know where your packets are going and how they are being routed?

"In a savvy Operational Risk Management enterprise, the "Corporate Intelligence Unit” (CIU) is alive and thriving."

A proactive intelligence-led investigation doesn't begin with a phone call from someone who say's, "My system is down" or "What does this Blue Screen mean”?

It doesn't start when your VP, Research & Development suddenly leaves the company for no apparent reason. Intelligence-led operations will continue to be the aspiration of many, yet only possessed by a few.

Analytic Techniques: Ai Derived Decisions...

 Structured Analytic Techniques have been useful in so many ways for decades to arrive at “TrustDecisions”.

What particular technique is/was your favorite over the years for your current role or profession?

• Decomposition & Visualization
• Idea Generation
• Scenarios & Indicators
• Hypothesis Generation & Testing
• Assessment of Cause & Effect
• Challenge Analysis
• Conflict Management
• Decision Support

Analysis in any community of highly trained human professionals requires thinking that challenges and reviews an individual persons strategy.

In the past, it required a series of proven methods for arriving at faster decisions that can be effectively proven reliable and explained to those who are uninformed.

The risks associated with a particular set of actions or strategy can not be entirely eliminated, yet the risks may be minimized by using proven and disciplined thinking models.

Testing a decision makers conclusions by utilizing standardized and structured analytic techniques may sometimes open new thinking for the decision maker and other times avoid a costly outcome.

Testing senior management human conclusions is vital in a high stakes business or in an increasingly important life or death decision.

How might you utilize a methodology to continuously make more effective “Trust Decisions” in your area of responsibility?

Will Ai decision support eliminate certain human analysis techniques once it has been verified, tested and proved its risk is acceptable?

“Analysis conducted by the intelligence, law enforcement and business communities will never achieve the accuracy, and predictability of a true science, because the information with which analysts must work is typically incomplete, ambiguous and potentially deceptive.” Page 165 Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis - 2nd Edition - by Richards J. Heuer Jr. & Randolph H. Pherson

In our near future, it will require analyzing the actual methods that a person or group has been using and then the utilization of “Structured Analytic Techniques” to actually determine their true reliability and outcomes.

Humans may indeed spend even more time and effort into the future analyzing and validating our Ai derived decisions…

RENS: Growing Your Enterprise...

 There he was, in the early morning light, prancing along outside the fence line just seventy-five feet away.

The young “Buck Deer” with his adolescent antlers stopped and glanced over at the house, just to acknowledge that he saw us sitting on the deck.

As Fall arrives and kids are back in school, it seems as if the pace of work and the demands on peoples time starts to take its toll. Be aware.

Years ago, as some wise people developed the systems and programs around the acronym RENS, they knew from years of experience on the front lines of true battle why it was so vital to success:

• Recruiting
• Education
• Networking
• Sharing Information

This is the high level context for what your daily activities shall be focused on each day, of each week of each month this year.

"How might you design your program, your systems, your time allocations towards these four key components of your enterprise?"

The original designers knew that each organization is unique and therefore, provided an acronym to keep you on track. Easy to remember, harder to implement effectively on a consistent basis.

If you advertise as one example, for a particular event and you ask people to RSVP, how do you respond after they fill out your form, full of personal contact details?

If they actually attend the event and take the time to see and hear all about your X or Y, how do you respond after they leave and think about what they heard and experienced at your event?

Do you follow-up or do nothing?

At a recent weekly event the guest speaker and very wise man broke down the Recruiting part of RENS to further to three simple steps:

• Belong
• Believe
• Behave

First, if you haven’t created an event where people immediately feel like they belong there, that you too believe in many of the same things they do, you will have a rough time ever getting to the last “B”.

How might you get other people to behave in a certain way?

The tough part about RENS is, that if you are not executing 100% on the effectiveness of your “Recruiting”, how will you ever get the opportunity to Educate, Network and then Share truly vital Information?

Perhaps even more difficult, how will you ever get good people to join your "Just Cause"?

As the “Young Buck” glanced back at us one more time as he went around the tall Spruce tree, we smiled and waved…

Analytic Priorities: Crossing the Digital RubiCON...

The governance of information within the government enterprise or the private sector enterprise remains very much the same. Both are subjected to a myriad of laws to help protect the civil liberties and privacy of U.S. citizens. Yet the data leaks, breaches and lost laptops keep both private sector and government organizations scrambling to cover their mistakes and to keep their adversaries from getting the upper hand. Again, the governance of information is the core capability that must be addressed if we are to have effective homeland security intelligence sharing to defeat the threats to the homeland 100% of the time.

The stakeholders in the information sharing environments will say that they have all the laws they need to not only protect information and also to protect the privacy of and liberties of U.S. citizens. What they may not admit, is that they do not have the assets within the context of their own organizations to deter, detect, defend and document the threats related to too much information being shared or not enough. These assets are a combination of new technologies, new education and situational awareness training and the people to staff these respective duties within the enterprise architecture.

Operational Risk Management is a continuous process in the context of our rapidly expanding corporate environments. What is one example? People traveling to emerging markets to explore new business opportunities or new suppliers that will be connected by high speed Internet connections to the supply chain management system. These boundaries of managing operational risk, have not only expanded, they have become invisible.

Ru·bi·con

1. a river in N Italy flowing E into the Adriatic

—Idiom

2. Rubicon, to take a decisive, irrevocable step

This "Digital Rubicon" before us, to take on a more "Active Defense" in navigating the risk across international waters of e-commerce, privacy and legal jurisdictions will forever shape our future. The decisions made on what constitutes an adversarial attack in the cyber domain, will not be as easy as the dawn of the nuclear age. Policy makers today have to weave the potential implications into a sophisticated decision tree that crosses the complex areas of intelligence, diplomacy, defense, law, commerce, economics and technology.

The new digital "Rule Sets" are currently being defined by not only nation states but the "Non-State" actors who dominate a segment of the global digital domains. The same kinds of schemes, ploys, communication tactics and strategies are playing out online and what has worked in the physical world, may also work even better in the cyber-centric environment. Corporations are increasingly under estimating the magnitude of the risk or the speed that it is approaching their front or back door steps.

The private sector is under tremendous oversight by various regulators, government agencies and corporate risk management. Yet the "public-private" "tug-of-war" over information sharing, leaks to the public press and Wikileaks incidents has everyone on full alert. As the government has outsourced the jobs that will take too long to execute or that the private sector already is an expert, operational risks have begun to soar.

As the private sector tasks morph with the requirements of government you perpetuate the gap for effective risk mitigation and spectacular incidents of failure. Whether it is the failure of people, processes, systems or some other clandestine event doesn't matter. The public-private paradox will continue as long as the two seek some form of symbiosis. The symbiotic relationship between a government entity and a private sector supplier must be managed no differently than any other mission critical resource within an unpredictable environment.

Once an organization has determined the vital combination of assets it requires to operate on a daily basis, then it can begin it's quest for enabling enterprise resiliency. The problem is, most companies still do not understand these complex relationships within the matrix of their business and therefore remain vulnerable. The only path to gaining that resilient outcome, is to finally cross that "Digital Rubicon" and realize that you no longer can control it.

The first step in any remediation program, is first to admit the problem and to accept the fact that it exists. Corporate enterprises and governments across the globe are coming to the realization that the only way forward is to cooperate, coordinate and contemplate a new level of trust.

Trust Decisions: "Lake Anne to Davos"...

The 2024 Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos Switzerland kicks off January 15-19. Are you traveling this weekend on your way to attend?

The 54th event theme this year is “Rebuilding Trust”.

On Jan 18 at 11:00 CET the session titled “Technology in a Turbulent World” will include CEO panelists from OpenAI, Salesforce, Accenture and Pfizer.

Why?

Flashback to Reston, Virginia in the 2012-2015 time frame, one of the most brilliant people on the topic of trust was across the table asking for relevant feedback.

While several meetings over coffee at home or near the plaza on “Lake Anne”, together, we were reading some of the early drafts of his anticipated book- “Achieving Digital Trust: The New Rules for Business at the Speed of Light”, byJeffrey Ritter:

“Despite decades of research on organizational trust, behavioral sociology, marketing, artificial intelligence, user interfaces, and human relationships, the vocabulary and tools needed to build digital trust simply do not exist. So, within these pages, I share with you a new portfolio of tools and resources:” (Page 24 / Achieving Digital Trust by Jeffrey Ritter).

The “War on Trust” of information was already on the way in 2012, and yet it was well over a decade since our organizations algorithms were exploring the digital universe.

Each night, downloading terabytes of World Wide Web content, for clients reporting and analysis.

“From the Board Room to our modern day asymmetric battlefield, Jeffrey Ritter’s Achieving Digital Trust will open eyes. It provides us with a reference model that management and software architects have been seeking. The survival of the Internet as we know it is currently at stake. This book provides a look into the transparency of «Trust Decisions» and how ensuring digital truth will shape our global governance for decades to come.” Peter L. Higgins, Managing Director & Chief Risk Officer, 1SecureAudit

And next week in Davos, the global key topic is “Rebuilding Trust”?

Think about who you have trusted in your life. How did it begin? Why does it last?

You just never forget sitting across the table from someone you actually trust.

Talking together face-to-face about topics of interest or working on a new innovative solution to a problem-set for all mankind.

Picture it. Looking at each other in the eyes and asking them: Why do you believe it?

• One person is a high IQ, highly educated international lawyer and Oxford professor on the evolution of the Internet.
• One person is from a small town and a college graduate / athlete, who started in business at the digital dawn, years before the Internet was born.

As we mutually reflect on the past, and imagine the future of our world on Earth as we continue to explore our Moon and beyond, we shall always remember.

At the 2015 World Economic Forum in Davos, Marc Benioff, the CEO of Salesforce observed:

“The digital revolution needs a trust revolution. There has been an incredible shift in the technology industry. . . . We’ve gone from systems of record to systems of engagement and now we are about to move into a world of systems of intelligence. But none of these will retain form or have referential integrity unless the customers trust them. Trust is a serious problem. The reality is that we all have to step up and get to another level of openness and transparency.” (Page 32 / Achieving Digital Trust)

Godspeed!

OPS Risk: Global Digital Spring...

 Over a decade later since the Arab Spring of 2011, our planet has witnessed the growth of personal mobile communications and the explosion of the Quantum "Internet of Things".

The utilization of wireless mobile communications and its intersection with social media apps in our emerging nations civilian environments is here to stay. 

How these latest digital consumer-based applications have been now leveraged for situational awareness (GPS) and information operations is exploding across the emerging nations, where the mobile Internet is now gaining even more ubiquitous use.

What this also means for our risk managers in the C-Suites of major technology companies is a heightened sensitivity and awareness to the ways your tools and capabilities could be utilized in the hands of the wrong end user.

No different than the early days of unleashing certain web tools like Metasploit, to help understand our digital vulnerabilities within the confines of the corporate enterprise.

These same new open-source “App tools” could be utilized by nefarious cyber forces to quickly exploit the unknown weaknesses in our own U.S. government and corporate network systems.

Yet like many inventions by our mission-driven mankind, they can be used for good and simultaneously for evil in the hands of a certain person.

Operational Risk Management in the high technology sector (Ai?) will be just as much of an imperative for continuous compliance as the manufacturing and international shipment of products from Barrett or the manufacturers of Detcord.

The "Export Control" compliance mechanism is here to stay and companies who operate in the new age of emerging social media via mobile technologies, will need more effective OFAC internal controls.

Operational Risks may exist within the business processes that you use with your international sales and business development organization.

When was the last time you had a compliance-based OFAC discussion within the ranks of the C-Suite at your new emerging technology company?

Are you fully funded by the VCs and ready to sell your new encrypted FinTech or social media app for Android to the world?

Innovative organizations need to make sure that part of the roll out strategy, encompasses the effective conversations with the correct government departments.

This is also to determine the right process and the online tools available to better understand where and who you can sell your products to outside of the United States.

The worlds last “Arab Spring” and the next organized movement utilizing social media and satellite mobile Internet technologies that include encrypted messaging, GPS and live video, shall be even more closely scrutinized by internal compliance officers and the regulatory watchdogs domestically and abroad.

Yet the most effective internal management tools going forward, may just lie in the same ones used by your own Mother and Father growing up.

The ethical and the growing moral arguments in many cases can have a dramatic impact on young people at an early stage in their lives, as you hand them their first mobile phone as a parent.

Perhaps it is still not too late to remind and reinforce and to emphasize the fact that our exponential High-performance computing (HPC) cyber environments, are powering nothing more than the digital mirror image of the physical world we already know about. Both Good and Bad.

Our future of effective enterprise Operational Risk Management (ORM) online and the effective compliance with potential legal sanctions, may well begin with a heart-to-heart conversation at your next company executive retreat or “All-Hands” fire side chat meeting...